Going away from the very adaptive connections that were used in the DesigntoProduction projects in the previous post, the Simpson company is one of the leaders in metal connections between wood members. These connections are not able to adapt to different circumstances as easily and would most likely have to be manipulated in order fit different situations.
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
Additional Wood Connections - Simpson
Going away from the very adaptive connections that were used in the DesigntoProduction projects in the previous post, the Simpson company is one of the leaders in metal connections between wood members. These connections are not able to adapt to different circumstances as easily and would most likely have to be manipulated in order fit different situations.
Monday, February 4, 2008
Exhibition Techtonics - Wood Connections
These are just a few examples of wood connections from the firm Designtoproduction. They utilize one standard connection piece for a series of differently angled pieces. Depending upon our capabilities with the router we have access to, this may be a good way to utilize a single connector type to join an infinite number of joints.
Detail Image of the Swissbau Pavilion designed by DesigntoProduction showing the butterfly joints used to attach all the differently mitered pieces.
Libeskind's Futuropolis was designed by Daniel Lideskind and realized by the DesigntoProduction firm. This installation uses similar joints to that of the Swissbau Pavilion. More detailed images of the connection can be seen at [http://www.designtoproduction.com]
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
Exhibit Analysis 2
"Some Assembly Required: Contemporary Prefabricated Houses"
Walker Art Center - 2006
Walker Art Center - 2006
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Exhibit Analysis
"Some Assembly Required: Contemporary Prefabricated Houses"
Walker Art Center - 2006
Walker Art Center - 2006
More to come.. check back.
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Reading Response
"Relations: Information Exchange in Designing and Making Architecture"
By Kevin Klinger
A response to the reading above:
In brief, the article discusses the connection between digital information technology and the architecture profession. Looking at both the current connection and also what the future might bring. The content of the reading was directly related to the beliefs and ideas of the Design to Production firm. They both discussed the connection between bringing complex geometries and forms into the world of architecture and the great need for the digital information to be able to break those geometries down into many simple forms, organize them, and eventually produce them. One of the main issues that I found most intriguing in the article was the idea of "consultation". This is an issue that many people tend to overlook or look past in the design process. The idea that many other professions and parameters factor in to the overall design and production of a building. Such things as the size of trucks available to move parts for the manufacturer to the site and the restrictions of size that a CNC mill can physically cut. These factors and others can then set the rules in which the master model breaks down the geometry in order to insure that the process runs smoothly from start to finish. Another important idea that was presented in the article was the current day disconnect between the architect, manufacturer and the builder. There are currently laws set in place in order to regulate the amount of discussion that can be had between an architect and manufacturer before a contract is signed. The article however argues that there is a great need with the push of digital technologies and manufacturing to not only allow architects and manufacturers to talk but to essentially collaborate on projects in order to create a more efficient process.
By Kevin Klinger
A response to the reading above:
In brief, the article discusses the connection between digital information technology and the architecture profession. Looking at both the current connection and also what the future might bring. The content of the reading was directly related to the beliefs and ideas of the Design to Production firm. They both discussed the connection between bringing complex geometries and forms into the world of architecture and the great need for the digital information to be able to break those geometries down into many simple forms, organize them, and eventually produce them. One of the main issues that I found most intriguing in the article was the idea of "consultation". This is an issue that many people tend to overlook or look past in the design process. The idea that many other professions and parameters factor in to the overall design and production of a building. Such things as the size of trucks available to move parts for the manufacturer to the site and the restrictions of size that a CNC mill can physically cut. These factors and others can then set the rules in which the master model breaks down the geometry in order to insure that the process runs smoothly from start to finish. Another important idea that was presented in the article was the current day disconnect between the architect, manufacturer and the builder. There are currently laws set in place in order to regulate the amount of discussion that can be had between an architect and manufacturer before a contract is signed. The article however argues that there is a great need with the push of digital technologies and manufacturing to not only allow architects and manufacturers to talk but to essentially collaborate on projects in order to create a more efficient process.
Barkow Leibinger - Frank Barkow
1. Decide number of sides for the polygon of the whole
2. Select two evenly separated points within that polygon
3. Connect the two points to the corners of the whole polygon
4. Fill created triangles with same number of sided polygons
5. Extrude polygons different depths
6. Allow some polygons to penetrate through the roof for daylight and ventilation
Design to Production - Fabian Scheurer
1. Identify a Shape
2. Identify number of platforms and distance between platforms
3. Vertically connect platforms with straight members
4. Identify the size of the vertical members
5. Identify the spacing of the vertical members
6. Alter the angle in plan
7. Identify what angle to rotate
8. Identify which platforms to rotate
9. Alter the scale of the platform
10. Identify scale factor
11. Identify which platforms to scale
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)